<span id="Regulatory_issues_and_lawsuits" class="mw-headline"><p><span id="Regulatory_issues_and_lawsuits" class="mw-headline"><strong><span>看看他们<span>吃<span title="了">了</span></span></span><span>多少</span><span>官司. 想买保险, 请找专业保险经纪人。 不要找这些缺德的骗子.有多少华人被骗, 却没有勇气去告这些骗子。 小心!!!</span></strong></span></p><p><span class="mw-headline">Regulatory issues and lawsuits:</span><span class="mw-editsection"><span class="mw-editsection-bracket"></span></span></p><p>Some state securities officials, including those in Iowa, Alabama, Missouri, Utah, and Minnesota, have filed lawsuits to bar inappropriate sales practices by <a title="World Group Securities" href="http://"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span style="color:#0066cc">World Group Securities</span></span></a> (WGS).<sup id="cite_ref-securities.utah.gov_1-1" class="reference"><a href="http://"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span style="color:#0066cc"><span>[</span>1<span>]</span></span></span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-26" class="reference"><a href="http://"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span style="color:#0066cc"><span>[</span>26<span>]</span></span></span></a></sup></p><ul><li>1) In March 2011, the <a title="Financial Industry Regulatory Authority" href="http://"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span style="color:#0066cc">Financial Industry Regulatory Authority</span></span></a> (FINRA) reported that World Group Securities had incurred ten regulatory penalties since 2004.<sup id="cite_ref-27" class="reference"><a href="http://"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span style="color:#0066cc"><span>[</span>27<span>]</span></span></span></a></sup></li></ul><ul><li>A 2004 NASD disciplinary action report summarized disciplinary actions against WGS. According to the report, WGS "submitted a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver, and Consent in which the firm was censured and fined $15,000. Without admitting or denying the allegations, the firm consented to the described sanctions and to the entry of findings that the firm permitted representatives to act in registered capacities while their registrations were inactive due to their failure to satisfy the Regulatory Element of NASD's Continuing Education Requirements. NASD also found that the firm failed to establish and maintain a supervisory system reasonably designed to assure compliance with the Regulatory Element of the Continuing Education Requirement by its registered representatives."<sup id="cite_ref-28" class="reference"><a href="http://"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span style="color:#0066cc"><span>[</span>28<span>]</span></span></span></a></sup></li></ul><ul><li>2) In December 2006, WGS and one of its brokers were fined $150,000 by Missouri's commissioner of securities for selling unsuitable products to elderly people.<sup id="cite_ref-iht.com_11-1" class="reference"><a href="http://"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span style="color:#0066cc"><span>[</span>11<span>]</span></span></span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-bloomberg_2-1" class="reference"><a href="http://"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span style="color:#0066cc"><span>[</span>2<span>]</span></span></span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-29" class="reference"><a href="http://"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span style="color:#0066cc"><span>[</span>29<span>]</span></span></span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-30" class="reference"><a href="http://"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span style="color:#0066cc"><span>[</span>30<span>]</span></span></span></a></sup> Other cases of private arbitration "where variable annuities were allegedly sold to people too old to realize any benefit before they died" were also reported. Utah's Division of Securities has cited at least four <a title="World Group Securities" href="http://"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span style="color:#0066cc">World Group Securities</span></span></a> brokers since 2006.<sup id="cite_ref-Bloomberg_Article_25-2" class="reference"><a href="http://"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span style="color:#0066cc"><span>[</span>25<span>]</span></span></span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-stockbrokerfraudblog.com_31-0" class="reference"><a href="http://"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span style="color:#0066cc"><span>[</span>31<span>]</span></span></span></a></sup></li></ul><ul><li>In April 2007, WGS was fined $50,000 for failing to supervise its representatives in the State of Utah, who were misrepresenting their credentials and services rendered during free lunch seminars targeting seniors.<sup id="cite_ref-securities.utah.gov_1-2" class="reference"><a href="http://"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span style="color:#0066cc"><span>[</span>1<span>]</span></span></span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-bloomberg_2-2" class="reference"><a href="http://"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span style="color:#0066cc"><span>[</span>2<span>]</span></span></span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-SEC_UT2_32-0" class="reference"><a href="http://"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span style="color:#0066cc"><span>[</span>32<span>]</span></span></span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-33" class="reference"><a href="http://"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span style="color:#0066cc"><span>[</span>33<span>]</span></span></span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-34" class="reference"><a href="http://"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span style="color:#0066cc"><span>[</span>34<span>]</span></span></span></a></sup></li></ul><ul><li>3) In April 2010, WGS was fined in excess of $850,000 as the result of the unauthorized sale of private securities by some of its agents in the State of Arizona.<sup id="cite_ref-35" class="reference"><a href="http://"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span style="color:#0066cc"><span>[</span>35<span>]</span></span></span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-SEC2009_36-0" class="reference"><a href="http://"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span style="color:#0066cc"><span>[</span>36<span>]</span></span></span></a></sup></li></ul><ul><li>In May 2010, the <a title="U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission" href="http://"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span style="color:#0066cc">U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission</span></span></a> (SEC) filed a federal case against two former brokers of WGS, accusing them of having raised approximately $14,800,000 through the offer and sale of <a title="Promissory notes" class="mw-redirect" href="http://"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span style="color:#0066cc">promissory notes</span></span></a> as part of an illegal <a title="Ponzi scheme" href="http://"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span style="color:#0066cc">Ponzi scheme</span></span></a> in the States of Ohio and Florida starting while the two were employed by WGS and using their customer contacts there.<sup id="cite_ref-InvestWatch_37-0" class="reference"><a href="http://"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span style="color:#0066cc"><span>[</span>37<span>]</span></span></span></a></sup></li></ul><ul><li>4) In November 2010, the SEC ordered WGS to pay, among other things, a civil monetary penalty in the amount of $200,000 for the fraudulent selling of unsuitable securities in the State of California, which were funded using home equity, derived from the refinance of the customers' homes into subprime mortgages.<sup id="cite_ref-SEC2008_38-0" class="reference"><a href="http://"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span style="color:#0066cc"><span>[</span>38<span>]</span></span></span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-39" class="reference"><a href="http://"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span style="color:#0066cc"><span>[</span>39<span>]</span></span></span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-SECDig2010_40-0" class="reference"><a href="http://"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span style="color:#0066cc"><span>[</span>40<span>]</span></span></span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-41" class="reference"><a href="http://"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span style="color:#0066cc"><span>[</span>41<span>]</span></span></span></a></sup></li></ul><ul><li>5) WFG Securities (Canada) was under investigation by the Manitoba Securities Commission in 2008, after some investors say they ended up in financial situations they did not understand regarding leveraged accounts. The securities commission noted that that World Financial Group "did not have adequate controls and mechanisms in place to fully supervise the leveraged accounts." WFG Securities paid a $250,000 settlement to rectify the situation. Dennis Villarin of Winnipeg, MB, a former agent who opened and trained others to open the above accounts, was stripped of his licensing and charged by the MFDA. They noted that Dennis Villarin and his trainees "made it appear to WFG's supervisory and compliance staff as though the clients satisfied WFG's requirements regarding the use of leveraging, as set out in it's policies and procedures." <sup id="cite_ref-42" class="reference"><a href="http://"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span style="color:#0066cc"><span>[</span>42<span>]</span></span></span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-43" class="reference"><a href="http://"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span style="color:#0066cc"><span>[</span>43<span>]</span></span></span></a></sup></li></ul><ul><li>6) In 2013, WFG Securities (Canada) was restructured and rebranded by Transamerica Corporation and is now known as Transamerica Securities of Canada Inc.Regulatory issues and lawsuits</li></ul></span><p><span class="mw-headline"></span><span class="mw-editsection"><span class="mw-editsection-bracket"></span></span> </p>
<p>剥削得再厉害的公司,最底层(且称为最下线)的人士也是有报酬的。</p><p><br/></p><p>唯独老鼠会是没有的,所以要拼命发展下线,每个人都拼命要当上线。</p><p><br/></p><p>还打着“We help people, we like to share”的旗号。</p><p><br/></p><p>Help?Share?最 下线连汤都没的喝能叫help,share?</p><p><br/></p><p>正常的帮别人也帮自己的工作,是不会每年都跑出去坐游艇的。</p>
时间:2013年09月14日 10:28 查看全文