23 lou, 24, 25:<br> <br>You are violating in discremination law!<br> <br>You said "Close to red is red, close to Black, is Black". What is that meaning????????<br>
To Dr. Liu,<br>
<br>
btw, your translation doesn't truly reflect what I said. 您的翻译不同于我的原意!<br>
<br>
even google does a better translation. here is what google said (sorry for not typing Chinese since it would be too slow for me).<br>
<br>
<SPAN id=result_box lang=zh-CN class=short_text closure_uid_g398f0="123" Uc="null" a="undefined" c="4"><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="207" Uc="null">1. 作为</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="208" Uc="null">一个黑人总统,</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="209" Uc="null">他应该</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="210" Uc="null">真实地</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="211" Uc="null">弥合</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="212" Uc="null">种族</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="213" Uc="null">的</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="214" Uc="null">分离</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="215" Uc="null">,并告诉</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="216" Uc="null">贫穷的黑人</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="217" Uc="null">有更多的</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="218" Uc="null">个人责任</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="219" Uc="null">,</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="220" Uc="null">不依赖于</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="221" Uc="null">政府</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="222" Uc="null">。</SPAN></SPAN><br>
<SPAN lang=zh-CN class=short_text closure_uid_g398f0="123" Uc="null" a="undefined" c="4"><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="222" Uc="null">2. <SPAN id=result_box lang=zh-CN closure_uid_g398f0="123" Uc="null" a="undefined" c="4"><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3139">他不应该</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3140">多</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3141">花</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3142">像他</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3143">过去4年中</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3144">,应该</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3145">至少</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3146">他曾许诺</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3147">在他的</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3148">第一次选举</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3149">,</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3150">这是</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3151">一半</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3152">对布什</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3153">的</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3154">削减赤字</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3155">。</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3156">这是为</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3157">我们的</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3158">下一代</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3159">。</SPAN><BR closure_uid_g398f0="3220"><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3160">3. </SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3161">他应该</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3162">消除</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3163">就业</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3164">招聘和</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3165">高校录取</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3166">的</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3167">平权行动</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3168">。</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3169">因此</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3170">,</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3171">我们的孩子</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3172">可以公平竞争</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3173">无反向</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3174">discrimintation</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3175">。</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3176">我们亚洲人</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3177">将最受益</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3178">,</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3179">如果</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3180">他</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3181">禁止</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3182">平权行动</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3183">。</SPAN><BR closure_uid_g398f0="3221"><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3184">4. </SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3185">他</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3186">改革</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3187">社会保障</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3188">和医疗保险</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3189">,</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3190">因此</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3191">,其</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3192">成本不会超过</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3193">收入</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3194">。</SPAN><BR closure_uid_g398f0="3222"><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3195">5. </SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3196">他应该</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3197">移民法</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3198">改革</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3199">,使之更加</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3200">基于</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3201">美国需要</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3202">什么</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3203">。</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3204">更多的技术</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3205">移民</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3206">。</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3207">有</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3208">少</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3209">的</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3210">家庭为基础的</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3211">移民</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3212">,使我们</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3213">的</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3214">人</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3215">带来更多的</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3216">贡献</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3217">,而不是</SPAN><SPAN closure_uid_g398f0="3218">依赖</SPAN></SPAN></SPAN></SPAN><br>
踩楼[0]顶[0]
游客IP:67.191.132.*发布于 2012-11-08 16:2413 楼#
<SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; FONT-SIZE: 6.5pt" lang=EN-US>To Dr. Liu,<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p></SPAN><br>
<SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; FONT-SIZE: 6.5pt" lang=EN-US> <o:p></o:p></SPAN><br>
<SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; FONT-SIZE: 6.5pt" lang=EN-US>I am not a Republican but an independent. If you truly try to put me into a party, I would be a libertarian. <o:p></o:p></SPAN><br>
<SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; FONT-SIZE: 6.5pt" lang=EN-US>I believe self reliance and minimum government. As long as the government guarantees fair competition, it should care less about the result. <o:p></o:p></SPAN><br>
<SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; FONT-SIZE: 6.5pt" lang=EN-US> <o:p></o:p></SPAN><br>
<SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; FONT-SIZE: 6.5pt" lang=EN-US>Government should not redistribute wealth and tax people just because they work hard and they are successful. Everyone, I mean everyone, should pay their fair share of taxes for the public good. Everyone should have skin in the game otherwise he/she will become a leech. No representation without taxation.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN><SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Government could help disabled, but not to help people just because they are poor but able. Helping poor is the responsibility of a charity not the government. <o:p></o:p></SPAN><br>
<SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; FONT-SIZE: 6.5pt" lang=EN-US> <o:p></o:p></SPAN><br>
<SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; FONT-SIZE: 6.5pt" lang=EN-US>Government shouldn't care everyone's belief and shouldn't care what's happening in someone's bedroom. Polygamy is fine as long as all parties involved are willing adult participants. The argument against polygamy is as weak as the argument against gay marriage. <SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>I just don’t see how Democrats support gay marriage without supporting polygamy. <SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>If someone wants to smoke pot, go ahead.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>However, he/she should be responsible for the consequences without tax payers paying for rehab in the future. <o:p></o:p></SPAN><br>
<SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; FONT-SIZE: 6.5pt" lang=EN-US> <o:p></o:p></SPAN><br>
<SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; FONT-SIZE: 6.5pt" lang=EN-US>Government should only be involved in foreign affaire (no wars unless US is attacked), education for kids (both public schools or voucher for someone to go to a school of their choice), and building infra structure (like roads and bridges). no welfare, no Medicare, no social security since they can get them from private market or supported by family if they work hard and manage their finance properly. <o:p></o:p></SPAN><br>
<SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; FONT-SIZE: 6.5pt" lang=EN-US> <o:p></o:p></SPAN><br>
<SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; FONT-SIZE: 6.5pt" lang=EN-US>I support woman's right to abortion but not funding of Planned Parenthood. They should get donations from people who support abortion but not from tax payers since not all tax payers support abortion. <o:p></o:p></SPAN><br>
<SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; FONT-SIZE: 6.5pt" lang=EN-US> <o:p></o:p></SPAN><br>
<SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; FONT-SIZE: 6.5pt" lang=EN-US>I support NPR and I am a loyal listener. But I don't support tax payer paying for it. NPR listeners should pay for it. <o:p></o:p></SPAN><br>
<SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; FONT-SIZE: 6.5pt" lang=EN-US> <o:p></o:p></SPAN><br>
<SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; FONT-SIZE: 6.5pt" lang=EN-US>What I feel wrong about this country is that more and more people in this country having the mentality that they want to other people to pay for their causes and their benefits. This is WRONG. Unfortunately, I think Obama is promoting that mentality.<o:p></o:p></SPAN><br>
<SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; FONT-SIZE: 6.5pt" lang=EN-US> <o:p></o:p></SPAN><br>
<SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; FONT-SIZE: 6.5pt" lang=EN-US>Democratic party is trying to redistributing wealth and force success people to pay for other people's benefit without making everyone to earn it. <o:p></o:p></SPAN><br>
<SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; FONT-SIZE: 6.5pt" lang=EN-US> <o:p></o:p></SPAN><br>
<SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; FONT-SIZE: 6.5pt" lang=EN-US>Republican Party is trying to force other people to follow their belief.<o:p></o:p></SPAN><br>
<SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; FONT-SIZE: 6.5pt" lang=EN-US> <o:p></o:p></SPAN><br>
<SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; FONT-SIZE: 6.5pt" lang=EN-US>Both parties are wrong!<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>The reason I didn’t vote for Obama is because Obama is making this country deep in debt and he is creating a class of handout depending people which we have to pay for it for a looooong time. So it is urgent to make sure his spending plans are blocked by congress. I am glad it is a split government. So the gridlock could be good for the country.<o:p></o:p></SPAN><br>
<P style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt" class=MsoNormal><SPAN lang=EN-US><o:p><FONT size=3 face="Times New Roman"> </FONT></o:p></SPAN><br>
姥姥:Romney 是哈佛第一届JD and MBA (法学院,商学院)学位。他就是您所说的跟您家一样的High IQ。真正的富二代,不需要这么努力的。<br>
踩楼[0]顶[0]
Dr.OlympiaLiu发布于 2012-11-08 06:0510 楼#
Appreciate all kind friends pointed out my article mistakes, and I have been corrected.<br>Appreciate 8 & 9 lou written by Junwuusa. I agreed with your idea & ZT President Obama's speach. <br>Also, Appreciate 15 lou, IP 8 points written in English. IP8 一向是共和党的观点,但他/她 祝贺Obama连任,并提出几点建议 Obama 改进以下几点, 我认为是值得提倡的:<br> <br>* 加强对依靠政府救济者的教育和立法;<br>* Cut the deficit:减财政赤字;<br>* Discrimintation:取消就业和大学录取等的歧视<br>* Reform social security and Medicare;社保和退休的改革<br>* Reform the immigration law 移民法的改革<br> <br>我们欢迎理性讨论,反对冷嘲热讽,坚决摒弃恶意的个人攻击。<br> <br> <br>
踩楼[0]顶[0]
游客IP:67.191.132.*发布于 2012-11-07 15:499 楼#
btw, rich people can be great president, Washington, Jefferson are rich. All our founding fathers are from super rich families.<br>
踩楼[0]顶[0]
游客IP:67.191.132.*发布于 2012-11-07 15:488 楼#
First of all, congratulation to Obaba and his team even though I didn't vote for him. Now I wish he can heel the devide and move to the political center. <br>1 As a black president, he should truely to bridge the racial devide and tell the poor black to have more personal responsibilities and less dependent on government. <br>2. He shouldn't over spend like his did in last four years and should cut the deficit at least to what he had promised in his first election which is half what of Bush's. This is for our future generation. <br>3. He should eliminate affirmative action in job hiring and college admission. So our kids can compete fairly without reverse discrimintation. We Asians will benefit the most if affirmative action is outlawed.<br>4. He should reform social security and Medicare so that its cost will exceed revenue.<br>5. He should reform the immigration law to make it more based on what US need. more technical based immigration than family based so that we bring more people which contribute that dependent.<br>
<FONT size=3><FONT face=Simsun>"妇女选票占了<SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: SimSun; FONT-SIZE: 12pt; mso-ascii-theme-font: minor-fareast; mso-fareast-font-family: SimSun; mso-fareast-theme-font: minor-fareast; mso-hansi-theme-font: minor-fareast; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New Roman'">50%" --- 妇女选票占了<SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: SimSun; FONT-SIZE: 12pt; mso-ascii-theme-font: minor-fareast; mso-fareast-font-family: SimSun; mso-fareast-theme-font: minor-fareast; mso-hansi-theme-font: minor-fareast; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New Roman'">53% in this 2012 general election.</SPAN></SPAN></FONT></FONT>
踩楼[0]顶[0]
junwuusa发布于 2012-11-07 09:382 楼#
<DIV class=commentbody itemprop="commentText">我个人认为,奥巴马在未来四年中如能保持过去四年的执政能力那么他将能在迄今四十多位美国总统的历史排名中排进前五。<BR><BR>或许有人不大同意我这观点。我这不是给一个民主国家的民选领袖献媚歌功颂德,我只是客观评价奥巴马过去四年的成绩,并据此“Project”他今后四年在正确的执政道路上“forward”应能达到的目标。<BR><BR>从老罗斯福提出全民健保,一百多年十八位总统过去了,但囿于各种既得利益守护者和愚昧顽固势力的极力阻挠以致各个时期的推动者全都无功而返。奥巴马不计在这议题上对他连任可能带来不利的政治风险,不惧共和党设的政治陷阱以致保守派孤注一掷不惜将官司打到高等法院的种种发难,终于在首任内便将此几乎不可能完成的任务完成了,光是这一项政绩就足以让奥巴马在内政上成为百年来最闪光的总统。<BR><BR>奥巴马不是一个只计算眼前政治得失得过且过的政客,他推动清洁能源减少对石油煤炭的依赖的政策无疑也会得罪很多保守势力,从短期利益的账面上看甚至也未必划算。但从长远看,这是让美国摆脱对国外的能源依赖,让环境更少污染,对解决全球暖化问题作出贡献对对子孙后代作出贡献的大好事。从这点德政上看,也少有其他美国总统能出其右。如果说国债问题仍是奥巴马的阿喀琉斯之踵,但起码他在能源环保这个无形的“国债”上他为美国的将来垫定了优势。并且我相信随着经济复苏,税收分配更合理,缓和或解决国债这问题能在他的第二任期内能够作出成绩来。<BR><BR>在外交上,是奥巴马果敢和计划周详的军事行动让从拉登到索马里海盗之类的恐怖势力走进日薄西山的困境。想想过去那二三十年,正是由于各个美国前任总统的忽略或失策,才让这些文明世界的敌人一日比一日猖獗。看看小布什执政那几年,美国九一一、西班牙三一一、印尼巴厘岛、印度孟买、再加上巴格达几乎每天都发生的自杀炸弹,直至奥巴马的执政才将这些恐怖活动的势头压制下去。<BR><BR>奥巴马上任伊始即走访,在土耳其埃及等大学演讲号召青年们实现他们的民主理想,他的演讲播下的种子终于在中东的穆斯林国家中发芽成长。在奥巴马政府的支持以至军事援助下,突尼斯,埃及,利比亚等一系列的中东国家推翻了军人独裁政府,连缅甸这样的军政府国家也在美国的推动下逐步开放走向民主(国务卿希拉里在这里的努力也同样功不可没)。<BR><BR>Forward! Let the hope be carried on!<BR></DIV>
作者:Dr.OlympiaLiu 时间:2012年11月07日 06:11 查看全文