<table style="border-bottom-color: rgb(192, 209, 240); border-bottom-width: 1px; border-bottom-style: solid;" border="0" cellSpacing="0" cellPadding="0" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr><td style="padding-top: 10px; padding-right: 5px;" height="200" vAlign="top" width="160" align="center"><div class="User-Level">No, Yi Jian Mei is wrong. As long as Lao Qian or anybody publish article in a public place with a name for public, he/she becomes a public figure. How insignifican he maybe, Lao Qian put himself in a place for prais and critisize. Since he didn't mind of praises he received, why he is so upset of the critics? A childish mind may explains this. To be a man face other's talk, or just shutup and keep his stupid mouth closed.</div><div class="User-Level"> </div><div class="User-Level"> </div><div class="User-Level"> </div><div class="User-Level"> </div><div class="User-Level"> </div><div class="User-Level"> </div><div style="display: none;" class="User-Credit1">鲜花：0 朵</div></td><td vAlign="top"><div class="Li-Floor"><div class="Alert"><br> <br>"Agree that some points of Lao Qian are a little extream. <br><br>But you may have overlooked a key issue:<br> <br>All articles from Lao Qian were about presidentail candidates, public affairs and public figures, but the entire article from 喇叭花 is abut Lao Qian. You still think they shouldb be treated with the same level of freedom of speech?"<br></div></div></td></tr>
</tbody>
</table> <br> <br>
I do not think Republic would give a penny to 老钱 but 老钱 does get Social Security money which 老钱 hates very much and which is called by 老钱 and republic as lazy people's welfare!
踩楼[0]顶[0]
游客IP:66.56.58.*发布于 2012-11-07 15:485 楼#
The title of posting is ugly, it reflects a person's mind. He or she must be ugly.
作者：钱老 时间：2012年11月06日 19:39 查看全文